<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better Fitting Pants That Don&#8217;t Fit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manzine.org/2009/09/03/better-fitting-pants-that-dont-fit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manzine.org/2009/09/03/better-fitting-pants-that-dont-fit/</link>
	<description>Lifestyle magazine for men by men.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://manzine.org/2009/09/03/better-fitting-pants-that-dont-fit/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manzine.org/?p=1421#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Great moments from late middle age. 

My wife and I went to Macy&#039;s (I think) to buy me a new pair of pants. Still resisting the idea that I&#039;d, ahem, somewhat expanded as the years had rolled by, I selected a pair of a waist and inseam size suited to my still rosy view of my stoneage. Of course, when I put them on, the result was less than optimal for that rosy view. I came out of the dressing room holding them and said, &quot;Gee, they&#039;re not cutting these pants they way they used to.&quot;  She just looked at me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great moments from late middle age. </p>
<p>My wife and I went to Macy&#8217;s (I think) to buy me a new pair of pants. Still resisting the idea that I&#8217;d, ahem, somewhat expanded as the years had rolled by, I selected a pair of a waist and inseam size suited to my still rosy view of my stoneage. Of course, when I put them on, the result was less than optimal for that rosy view. I came out of the dressing room holding them and said, &#8220;Gee, they&#8217;re not cutting these pants they way they used to.&#8221;  She just looked at me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://manzine.org/2009/09/03/better-fitting-pants-that-dont-fit/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manzine.org/?p=1421#comment-298</guid>
		<description>True &#039;nuff.  Still, you can avoid having three major things wrong with the fit!  If you&#039;re going to go too tight, then it should at least fit in the legs. If you&#039;re going for comfort, it might be a little baggy.  In either case, you&#039;re pants shouldn&#039;t be more than 1/2 inch or so off in length, since inseam lengths are variable off-the-rack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True &#8217;nuff.  Still, you can avoid having three major things wrong with the fit!  If you&#8217;re going to go too tight, then it should at least fit in the legs. If you&#8217;re going for comfort, it might be a little baggy.  In either case, you&#8217;re pants shouldn&#8217;t be more than 1/2 inch or so off in length, since inseam lengths are variable off-the-rack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Fine Jay</title>
		<link>http://manzine.org/2009/09/03/better-fitting-pants-that-dont-fit/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>One Fine Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manzine.org/?p=1421#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Those pants are UGLY! There are worse things, though: recall Renaissance Italy when men wore these stupid capes atop stockings. That said, getting good trousers is an exercise in expense: getting the perfect fit requires a tailor; going RTW means you&#039;re going so sacrifice on one region of the pant: seat, crotch, hip, it doesn&#039;t matter. A part of you will always be unflattering as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those pants are UGLY! There are worse things, though: recall Renaissance Italy when men wore these stupid capes atop stockings. That said, getting good trousers is an exercise in expense: getting the perfect fit requires a tailor; going RTW means you&#8217;re going so sacrifice on one region of the pant: seat, crotch, hip, it doesn&#8217;t matter. A part of you will always be unflattering as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

