<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MANzine &#187; Health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manzine.org/category/health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manzine.org</link>
	<description>Lifestyle magazine for men by men.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Weight Training Tip:  Go Heavy</title>
		<link>http://manzine.org/2010/05/14/weight-training-tip-go-heavy/</link>
		<comments>http://manzine.org/2010/05/14/weight-training-tip-go-heavy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 12:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manzine.org/?p=1811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people who work out are doing it wrong, argues former Marine turned fitness guru J.D. Johannes.

BIG WEIGHTS, BIG GAINS, BIG FAT LOSS
Numerous university studies have found that the optimal amount of  weight a person should use is between 65% and 80% of what is called One  Repetition  Maximum.  Other studies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmanzine.org%2F2010%2F05%2F14%2Fweight-training-tip-go-heavy%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmanzine.org%2F2010%2F05%2F14%2Fweight-training-tip-go-heavy%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>Most people who work out are doing it wrong, argues former Marine turned fitness guru <a title="Summer Shape Up: How Much Should I Lift" href="http://www.fitforcombatsystem.com/articles/summer-shape-up-how-much-lift.html">J.D. Johannes</a>.
<blockquote>
<h3><a href="http://manzine.org/wp-content/uploads/dumbell.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1814 alignright" title="dumbell" src="http://manzine.org/wp-content/uploads/dumbell.jpg" alt="dumbell" width="300" /></a>BIG WEIGHTS, BIG GAINS, BIG FAT LOSS</h3>
Numerous university studies have found that the optimal amount of  weight a person should use is between 65% and 80% of what is called <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15335243" target="_blank">One  Repetition  Maximum</a>.  Other studies have found that &#8220;maximum  hypertrophy occurs with loads from 80-95% 1RM.&#8221;

The One Repetition Maximum is the maximum weight a  person can lift one time.  It is often referred to as One Rep Max or  RM.

Trying to determine your RM by actually going  into the gym and seeing how much weight you can move on a single  repetition is a hazardous thing that few people actually recommend.  The  safer approach is to use a <a href="http://www.timinvermont.com/fitness/orm.htm" target="_blank">Rep  Max calculator</a>.

The calculators are not perfect, but they are  close enough to effective.

In Megan&#8217;s case she could do 55 pounds for four  reps.  By standard calculations, she could lift 60 pounds one time.

For maximum benefit she should try to work with  80% of her Rep Max, which is 48 pounds.  Since most dumbbells move in  five pound increments, Megan should use 45 or 50 pound dumbbells.

Using heavier weights leads to muscle hypertrophy  which increases muscle tone and stimulates the metabolism to burn more  calories.

Heavy weightlifting cranks up the metabolism by  redirecting calories into repairing muscle and building just a little  bit more which is why <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/health/06real.html?ref=todayspaper" target="_blank">weight lifting is so effective for losing fat</a>.
<h3>MASTERING METABOLIC MUSCLE</h3>
Lifting weights at around 80% of Rep Max creates  what professional fitness competitor Nita Marquez calls the triple  threat of fat loss.

A person lifting weights is obviously burning  calories during their workout.

If they are lifting heavy enough to stimulte  hypertrophy, they will be burning calories long after the workout is  done as their muscles repair from the micro-trauma, the itty-bitty tears  and pulls, caused by the heavy weights.

The little bit of extra muscle built from the  heavy weight lifting also burns a few extra calories a day.

The process works like this:  Presume you have  &#8220;M&#8221; amount of muscle on your biceps.  You do two or three sets of heavy  arm curls which inflicts some micro-trauma on the muscles.  Over the  course of the next few days the body has to use extra calories to repair  the muscle to its original state and will add just a little bit more.

Expressed in a series formula it might look like  this:

M, M-.5, M, M+.1

The repair the muscle and increase muscle tone  and size burns as many calories as the actual workout.

If a person is not using heavy enough weights to  inflict significant micro-trauma and stimulate hypertrophy, the only  calories burned are from the workout itself.

When Megan was using 35-pound dumbells, she was  only working at 58% of her Rep Max which the studies show is usually not  enough to get the benefits of weight lifting.  She burned calories  during the workout, but not very many after the workout.

To get the maximum benefit from your workout use  weights around 80% of your One Rep Maximum.  Most people can lift more  weight than they think and once they start, the results can be amazing.</blockquote>
Of course, if your current regime consists of high repetitions with 12 (fluid) once weights, this may not be your chief concern.

via <a title="WEIGHT TRAINING: How much should you lift?" href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/99243/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+instapundit%2Fmain+%28Instapundit%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">Glenn Reynolds</a><img src="http://manzine.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1811&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://manzine.org/2010/05/14/weight-training-tip-go-heavy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men, Women &amp; Porn: A Love Story</title>
		<link>http://manzine.org/2009/08/29/men-women-porn-a-love-story/</link>
		<comments>http://manzine.org/2009/08/29/men-women-porn-a-love-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manzine.org/?p=1332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fastest growing segment of porn consumers are females - single, married, involved - and the younger the woman, the more likely they are to have their own porn collection stashed away at home.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmanzine.org%2F2009%2F08%2F29%2Fmen-women-porn-a-love-story%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmanzine.org%2F2009%2F08%2F29%2Fmen-women-porn-a-love-story%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>	<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1355" href="http://manzine.org/2009/08/29/men-women-porn-a-love-story/couple-watching-porn/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1355" style="border: 2px solid black; margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px;" title="couple-watching-porn" src="http://manzine.org/wp-content/uploads/couple-watching-porn.jpg" alt="couple-watching-porn" width="415" height="275" /></a>It was 10 years ago that I decided to write a piece on &#8220;Mainstreaming Pornography.&#8221; I had recently gotten out of a relationship with a woman who liked porn, was turned on by porn, and was turned on even more when we watched it together. Believing this was something of an oddity, I researched the subject and discovered to my surprise that there were millions of women who were porn consumers, and that many more actually found certain types of pornography sexually stimulating in the lab.</p>
	<p>Unfortunately, I never sold the piece. Perhaps I was ahead of my time because today, the fastest growing segment of porn consumers are females &#8211; single, married, involved &#8211; and the younger the woman, the more likely they are to have their own porn collection stashed away at home.</p>
	<p>There is still a stigma attached to porn viewing by women (&#8221;nice girls don&#8217;t do it&#8221;) but mores in America are changing fast and if you haven&#8217;t noticed, porn sellers are making it a point to market all kinds of adult products to women. Several chain stores like Starship and Good Vibrations report almost half their walk in business comes from women.</p>
	<p>But what of the porn industry itself? Industry analysts say that more than 70% of all adult films made still cater to the tastes of men. And while those &#8220;tastes&#8221; may not have changed much since the first guy figured out that a woman has three orifices, and that it feels good sampling all of them, there has been a decided shift in what is considered &#8220;mainstream&#8221; today as opposed to 30 years ago.</p>
	<p>Yes, real men like anal sex according to today&#8217;s standards. <a href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/wp-admin/post-new.php">This survey </a>from 2006 revealed changes in attitude toward the act that, according to my unscientific observations, mirror the rise in popularity of anal sex porn in the 1990&#8217;s:</p>
	<p><em>The survey, released last year, showed that 38.2 percent of men between 20 and 39 and 32.6 percent of women ages 18 to 44 engage in heterosexual anal sex. Compare that with the CDC’s 1992 National Health and Social Life survey, which found that only 25.6 percent of men 18 to 59 and 20.4 percent of women 18 to 59 indulged in it.</em></p>
	<p>Here we have a classic case study of media influence; did the rise in interest in anal sex drive the porn industry to make more films in that genre or did the explosion of films portraying anal sex in the 1980&#8217;s and 90&#8217;s drive the curiosity seekers to try it in their own lives? This leads to a further question; what influence does pornography have on sexual practices in America?</p>
	<p>Modern pornography &#8211; dating to the Victorian era where the camera was first employed to take risque pictures &#8211; has never been much of a mystery for men. If you&#8217;ve viewed any classic porn, you know that much if it is rather vanilla in nature. Classic woman alone, one or two women with one or two (or more) men, two women &#8212; all catering to common males fantasies and are still staples of the porn industry today. Of course, there were examples of homosexual porn as well as rare fetish porn, but by and large, the market catered to men with &#8220;ordinary&#8221; tastes in sex.</p>
	<p>This held true through the 1970&#8217;s after the breakthrough films <em>Deep Throat</em>, and <em>Behind the Green Door</em> made it hip to take your date to the local &#8220;art house.&#8221; But the invention of the VCR changed the porn industry forever. Now, because porn consumerism exploded, even fetish and gay videos could find a niche in the market and make big money.</p>
	<p>Today on the internet, I challenge you to invent a fetish and not already find dozens of porn titles that cater to it. Everything from head to toe, hair to ankle worship, and all the bodily functions in between now has its own sub-genre on streaming porn sites. I suppose this is progress but since I&#8217;m pretty much of a vanilla sort of fellow myself, I have refrained from investigating.</p>
	<p>Most of these fetish films cater to men. But interestingly, women seem to get aroused watching just about <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/personal/07/24/o.women.watching.porn/">any kind of pornography:</a></p>
	<blockquote><p>Even more compelling were the results of a 2004 study at Northwestern University that also assessed the effect of porn on genital arousal. Mind you, a copy of &#8220;Buffy the Vampire Layer&#8221; and a lubed-up feedback device isn&#8217;t most girls&#8217; idea of a hot night in. But when the researchers showed gay, lesbian, and straight porn to heterosexual and homosexual women and men, they found that while the men responded more intensely to porn that mirrored their particular gender orientation, the women tended to like it all. Or at least their bodies did.</p></blockquote>
	<p>Today&#8217;s internet porn recognizes the surging female audience in a variety of ways. The two biggest pay-per-minute sites &#8212; HotMovies.com and AEBN.com &#8212; feature a &#8220;For Women&#8221; genre that streams movies with more of a storyline, as well as films that realize specific female fantasies. HotMovies has a genre with movies directed by women, another fast growing facet of the adult film business.</p>
	<p>No stats are available from the two streaming video sites regarding female viewership, but <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/personal/07/24/o.women.watching.porn/">Hustler&#8217;s Theresa Flynt</a> reports that 56% of their DVD sales are made to women.</p>
	<p>The cultural earthquake being caused by the widespread acceptance of pornography by both sexes has yet to be measured. How does it affect our attitudes toward partner sex? Toward women? Men?</p>
	<p>Seeing that porn is an estimated $57 billion dollar industry world wide ($10-14 billion in the US), the social scientists will probably have enough data to keep them busy for years.
</p>
<img src="http://manzine.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1332&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://manzine.org/2009/08/29/men-women-porn-a-love-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prostate Cancer: Get Checked</title>
		<link>http://manzine.org/2009/08/10/prostate-cancer-get-checked/</link>
		<comments>http://manzine.org/2009/08/10/prostate-cancer-get-checked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manzine.org/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogosphere veteran Jeff Jarvis has announced that he has prostate cancer.  He&#8217;s handling it with his usual good humor and the prognosis is very encouraging.  But only because his doctors caught it very early. Which means he got himself to said doctors.

There&#8217;s a lesson there, no?

Dr. Paul O&#8217;Neill, writing at WebMD, has a good synopsis. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmanzine.org%2F2009%2F08%2F10%2Fprostate-cancer-get-checked%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmanzine.org%2F2009%2F08%2F10%2Fprostate-cancer-get-checked%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>Blogosphere veteran <a title="Jeff Jarvis prostate cancer" href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/08/10/the-small-c-and-me/">Jeff Jarvis</a> has announced that he has prostate cancer.  He&#8217;s handling it with his usual good humor and the prognosis is very encouraging.  But only because his doctors caught it very early. Which means he got himself to said doctors.

There&#8217;s a lesson there, no?

<a rel="attachment wp-att-925" href="http://manzine.org/2009/08/10/prostate-cancer-get-checked/doctor-glove/"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-925" style="border: 2px solid black; margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px;" title="doctor-glove" src="http://manzine.org/wp-content/uploads/doctor-glove-500x331.jpg" alt="doctor-glove" width="300" /></a>Dr. Paul O&#8217;Neill, writing at WebMD, has a <a title="Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Problems" href="http://www.webmd.com/prostate-cancer/guide/prostate-cancer-digital-rectal-exam">good synopsis</a>.  Here&#8217;s the key:
<blockquote>To help detect prostate cancer in its early stages, the American Cancer Society advises offering annual screening starting at age 50 to men who have at least a 10 year life expectancy. They encourage men who are at high risk, such as African-American men and men with a family history of prostate cancer, to begin screening at age 45. Men at an even higher risk, such as having several relatives with a history of prostate cancer at an early age, could begin testing at age 40. The American Urological Association agrees that annual screening should begin at age 50 but encourages men in high risk groups, such as African-Americans or those with a family history, to begin screening at age 40 as opposed to 45.</blockquote>
So, if you&#8217;re over a Certain Age and haven&#8217;t gotten a checkup lately, what are you waiting for?  Get your ass to the doctor.

<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xHKTE75dgE4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xHKTE75dgE4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><img src="http://manzine.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=923&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://manzine.org/2009/08/10/prostate-cancer-get-checked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
